By no means is this legal advice and nor can I state if I think it is “Legal” but I can tell you what I have found in other areas and what I as a citizen think is fair. Nuisance abatement laws are a new instrument that many municipalities are attempting to enforce. Depending on how they are drafted, some owners question the constitutionality of the law. Assuming the laws is properly drafted it is in my humble opinion (not that my opinion carries any legal weight) that a vacant parcel of land can potentially present a Nuisance to adjacent properties if it is not kept and maintained in a manner consistent with city code. Vacant parcels can be home to stray animals, debris, etc. To me the question is, “is it fair to impose a tax/fee on a land owner if the property they own potentially posses the capability of becoming a nuisance?” I due fee the municipalities need to monitor nuisances and potentials nuisances but should the cost of that be passed to everyone in the jurisdiction or should the individual landowner be subject to the cost. It seems fair to charge all for the landowners for the oversight and monitoring of the properties and then only penalize the offenders (actual nuisances) for the additional burden of enforcement. From the city aspect, how do you resolve the additional cost of the monitoring of the potential nuisances?
As for now there is a law on the books it is being enforced if someone feels that their rights are being infringed upon or that the law is someway in violation of state or federal law I would advise them to seek the advice of an attorney. Keep in mind there are some exceptions to the fees, such as if they are currently trying to sell the property, or major construction on the property. They can apply for a waiver but if it is just vacant land sitting idle they may be stuck with a fee. Also keep in mind that Carbondale is governed under Home Rule Charter so they can levy taxes a bit different that other municipalities so they could abolish the registration fee and conceivably just raise taxes….
An interesting scenario might be two adjunct properties owned by the same person separately deeded and separate tax map numbers one has a structure and one is vacant… is the vacant property subject to the fee? Many laws are passed with good intentions but passed in haste or without full thought of all possible “issues”. I am a firm believer that municipalities should consult with real estate professionals that are knowledgeable in these matters. They often seek the guidance of attorneys which happen to be “generalists” in the law but when it comes to real estate matter they sometimes lack the knowledge of this specialty.
I hope that helps…